SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

DRaysBay

Baseball America's Rays Top 30 Prospect List

Thanks to Marc Topkin (Tampa Bay Times) for tweeting out the full list. You can find this list in the Baseball America Prospect Handbook:

  1. Moore
  2. Lee
  3. Archer
  4. Guerreri
  5. Colome
  6. Torres
  7. Beckham
  8. Romero
  9. Vettleson
  10. Mahtook
  11. Guyer
  12. Hager
  13. Dietrich
  14. Brett
  15. Bailey
  16. Markel
  17. Suarez
  18. Goeddel
  19. Bush
  20. Snell
  21. Lara
  22. Vogt
  23. W. Rodriguez
  24. Linsky
  25. Martin
  26. Carter
  27. O'Conner
  28. Rivero
  29. Bortnick
  30. Thompson
  31. Malm
  32. Lobstein

So Josh Sale and Robinson Chirinos both didn't make the list. Any other notable omissions or odd rankings that you notice?

0 recs  |  205 comments

Comments

I'm still scratching my head over Sale.

I know last season wasn’t great, but can’t believe that he doesn’t make Top 30. They must REALLY hate his bat.

We took the wrong HS outfielder from the west coast

The Marlins took the right one

Right, O'Connor made the list

Surprised Baileyand Suarez are so high. Also found Vogt’s place curious, thats a pretty big endorsement of the legitimacy of his bat.

Tyler Bortnick on the other hand never gets love.

I shoudl clarify that if Suarez is so high, Joe Cruz should also be considered.
MY thoughts exactly.
Did not expect O'Connor over Sale.
The only thing I can think of is

that O’Conner does have catch and throw skills and a scarce position in his favor.

If they are really that low on Sale’s bat, then he doesn’t have any other plus tools.

But I’d really like to know what they saw last season that dropped him slow low.

Agreed.

Sale was bad, but he wasn’t O’Conner level bad.

Sale had a respectable BB:K rate last year

Gives me hope that mechanical issues can be worked out

Agreed.

Sale was bad, but he wasn’t O’Conner level bad.

From the Rays chat with Bill Balew on Sale.

“I believe it was more of a mental thing than any other aspect. He got a little pull happy and seemed completely out of rhythm. In people I’ve spoken with, some believe he had so many things going through his head that it was paralysis by analysis. Hopefully he can clear his mind this winter and arrive in spring training with a clean slate. He’s likely headed to Princeton or Hudson Valley.”

Doesn’t sound like enough to completely leave him off list.

and Ballew on O'Conner

“O’Conner is definitely in the top 30. It’s all about making more consistent contact and ironing a few rough spots in his catching mechanics. He has good bat speed but struggles with his balance and his plate discipline, which led to a strikeout rate of 40 percent. That has to improve, but O�Conner is a hard worker who has the drive and determination to succeed.”

But he doesn't make the top 30 list though, does he?
Doesn’t sound like enough to completely leave him off list.

Seriously it sounds like jsutification for not lowering him much from last year.

yup... makes very, very little sense.
I have yet to read anything from a scout from the past year

Who thinks his swing issues are correctable. I hope for everyone’s sake they’re wrong, and Sale does have a reputation of being a gym rat, but if he can’t hit, he has no value. Even Cody Rogers is a better prospect than Sale if his swing issues actually are fundamental.

That said, I agree that if it’s a mental issue, he shouldn’t be out of the top 30.

When I talked to Sale at the Winter Development Camp

I asked him about his hitting coach. He has his own back home and he works at the gym he built there with his bonus money. I got the feeling that he was almost like a second father-figure to him. He said that his coach would be with him “forever.”

I have no evidence to support this theory, but it might be possible that his personal hitting coach is the one responsible for his current swing mechanics. If so, then there may indeed be little hope for Sale…as like I said he made a point of letting me know that his coach meant a lot to him.

I didn't like how stubborn he sounded in the interview.
I am doing a follow-up with him

hopefully tomorrow. A lot of the audio from my previous interview is in bad shape. But if all goes well I’ll be talking to him again soon.

I just got off the phone with Ryan Brett and will have a story on him up in the next few days here or on Rays Digest. He works out at Sale’s gym, so I was able to get a little more info on this.

Bailey is supposed to be a good defender, and his wRC+ was 96, his wOBA+ was 98, and his OPS+ was 95. SO it wasn't like he was awful with the bat.

Suarez has great stuff, but health seems like too big of an issue.

The point of these should be about going forward, not what they've done.

If he has a massive hole in his swing then that will only get exploited more the higher he goes up the system. They must really like his glove.

Bailey did mash RHP last year

Something positive to go with at least

this is proof positive with how short-sighted this ratings are.
"this"
got me! you must be nailing that grammar course in your exclusive MBA program!
I has to be done. you know this
Luke Bailey and Albert Suarez both seem very high.
And Snell and Wilking Rodriguez are both really high.
Also interesting that they didn't choose to rank Hernandez.

No scouting reports to give.

I don't think they ever rank VSL/DSL players

They’ll occasionally rank international signings who have only played complex ball, but I can’t remember them ever ranking someone who never made it stateside.

Yeah makes sense.

I don’t remember seeing any either. Since the book is really a compilation of scouting reports, then it makes sense to not rank a player that they haven’t seen play live.

Speaking of Hernandez, the few reports on him have all been positive.

I’m getting more excited about him. His power is supposed to be pretty good and he is supposed to be toolsy.

Do you have links to reports?

I have been searching high and low for ANYTHING on him. He has become an obsession. As soon as I get to Spring Training, I am going straight to wherever he is and shoot video and whatever else I can do to get some more info on him so we can all stop suffering from the lack of information.

Hey Gil Renard, please don't shoot our players
This is from Alskor at bullpen banter (he is a fairly reliable source):
Seth, I asked around about Hernandez after seeing your question. I had got a couple positive notes on him before that motivated me to rank him in the 20’s on my Rays list but they were vague… like “that kid is a real sleeper,” stuff like that… Not much sentiment for ranking him higher, as people seem to want to see what he can do against better pitching in a more difficult league first.

The response I got now after digging deeper was that he’s a raw catcher with some impressive tools across the board. Excellent feel for hitting given his age and his approach gets very good marks from everyone. Hitting tools are still raw but he flashes the ability to hit for plus contact & plus power. Good arm and quick feet behind the plate. He projects as a good defensive backstop depending on how his body grows… and it looks like his bat could play at other positions, too. You can tell the Rays hold him in pretty high esteem by the fact they had him at fall instructs as a 17 year old.

Everyone seems to mark Hernandez as a guy to watch… but again, he’s very young and still growing into his tool and body. Over the next year we’ll have a much clearer image of where the tools are going, what kind of player Hernandez can be and if there’s star potential here. Definitely someone I’ll be keeping an eye on.

blackoutyears at mlbbonusbaby (he is a very respected and knowledgable poster there. He has contacts are sees plenty of players) mentioned that he heard he was a toolsy player.

This thread has some pitcures on him: http://forums.theraysrepublic.com/index.php?showtopic=6668 However, I don’t trust the notes much as I’m not a big fan of his.

How does compare to someone like Montero
Oscar doesn't seem like he will stay at C
Based on?
Just a guess
His face looks like Pudge.

Based on that, I project him to be a great defensive catcher.

Not unless he changes his last name to Molina
the Molina family don't have one of them Oscars yet, I'm sure they could work something out.
Probably the reason we signed Jose

Just to convince him that his family should adopt Oscar.

I wish he'd change his last name to Prado.
Most good hitting catchers don't

I’m not saying I agree, but even the ones who could work defensively often get moved in the minors to increase longevity and bat impact. This seems to have become less common in the last 5 years or so though.

He is supposed to be athletic.

And Mike whatever-his-name-is hinted that he can play some defense in a raysprospects.com interview.

This is what I was thinking

If he can hit, they will not want to wear him down. Kinda like a Wil Myers

He must have dat der ESPN.
i like the Bush ranking

I think he will be this years Sept pen addition

No Goetzman or Eierman either.
That is funny, since I thought both were higher than Kes Carter pre-draft.
I really like Granden

hopefully he can turn things around at the plate.

One of these days I'll publish the interview with Goetzman from Winter Development Program.

But he told me he was hurt last year. Can’t remember what it was. Shoulder maybe?

i really like carter
I like him when he is healthy.
Here is a report on Lobstein....
Lobstein has been an enigma since he signed for $1.5 million as a second-round pick in 2008. The Rays expected him to add velocity as his body matured but that hasn’t been the case. His fastball continues to reside at 85-88 mph, though it does have late life and he throws it from a tough angle. His strikeout rate has decreased throughout his pro career, and he has compensated with control and command. He works his fastball down in the strike zone and tries to get hitters to swing at it early in the count. His best pitch is his plus changeup, and he also mixes in a sharp curveball and a cutter that handcuffs opponents at times. Lobstein also has impressed Tampa Bay with his mound presence and his calm approach while on the bump. He has good athleticism and and displays an advanced knowledge of how to pitch. Even if his velocity doesn’t pick up, the Rays believe Lobstein can fill a role in the back of a major league rotation. After reaching Double-A Montgomery at the end of last season, he’ll return there to open the 2012 campaign.
reading that I think I would rather take Riefenhauser over him

I’d wonder their thoughts on him

Why?

Lobstein’s stuff is better. THey have said before the Riefenhauser does not have a single pitch that is better than average.

they are close but at some point I want to go with results over stuff

when the stuff isn’t that great like it doesn’t seem like Lobstein’s, especially the fastball.

They really are not close when it coems to stuff.

Similar fastballs while one guy has a plus pitch and two other potentially good ones. Riefenhauser doesn’t have a single plus pitch. And, for the record, I don’t want to be known as a Riefenhauser hater and I don’t want to get mocked if his stuff is better. I just have to go with the only info we have.

Sounds a little like JP Howell

Except Howell came out of UT, while Lobstein came out of high school. Wonder what his splits are like… A move to the pen might not be out of the question. Thoughts?

Not really

Howell had 5 pitches, broke Clemens’ strikeout record at UT and had great K rates all through the minors. Lobstein is a three pitch nibbler who hasn’t had great K rates.

yup yup
JP Howell went to my high school

and he was awesome.

Lobstein is rubbish

Watched him twice last year and he was lucky to reach 87 on the Stadium gun.

No swing and miss pitch. Lots of flyballs

Pass

Was unaware of the flyball rate

With the seemingly lack of an out pitch, he needs to keep the ball down. So maybe you’re right, doesn’t seem like he’s nearly the prospect he used to be going forward.

This was the two times I watched last year

Nothing special offspeed

A 40% groundball rate isn't bad.

And his changeup is supposed to be a swing-and-miss pitch.

In two games

I saw maybe 4-5 Swings and misses. I also watched Moore twice at the same level and he had 20 both games, but he is a freak.

A 40% GB rate *is* bad
It is?

That was right around league average last year.

Its pretty bad in the minors
Sounds like he is adapting to his new game though

It obviously doesn’t look good, but I’m not certain he should be written off. If he’s extremely effective against lefties, then maybe a lefty specialist role would suit him well. Not sure what his splits are. IIRC, minor league splits are hard to find.

Became very sad when minor league baseball made them shut down minorleaguesplits.com

It’s so stupid. Even if MiLB actually does own the numbers (and it’s a tenuous argument at best that they do), one would think they’d WANT more publicity and information so that more people get into their real product, which is the games.

John, do I get scouting reports on all these guys with him subscription?

And if so, how do I find them? Or do I need to get the handbook….

The subscription I gave you will give scouting reports on most guys.

But most of them are pre-draft. I’ll fetch links for you in a sec. The current scouting reports will be available only in the book except for the top 10 which you’ll be able to access as a subscriber.

Here is link.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft/# If you click on the binoculars it will give a pre-draft scouting report .

Thanks.

How much does the book cost? I can’t seem to get my computer to got the page.

I think it was 29.95 when I pre-ordered it.

Trust me you’ll be getting e-mails from them about it now that you’re on their mailing list.

Also…here is link to current scouting reports for their Top 10.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2012/2612743.html

32.95 per the email i got today... still need to order mine.
I'm going to order him then.... it has the top 30 reports, right?
yup... id say it's in the top 10 purchases i make every year.
Going from my list, Sale, Goetzman, Eierman, Ames, Hernandez, and Canzler seem like the obvious ommisions.
I had all of those guys on my list too.

Except I think I had Carpenter instead of Ames.

I probably would have Carpenter on my list too if I re-did it.
I'm suprised they have Vogt at 22 but not Canzler

although I agree on Canzler, I just don’t have Vogt so high

Keep in mind

That BA’s offices are located in Durham, and by virtue of that, guys who play there are probably seen by more of the staff than players from any other team in the minors. Plus, at least Vogt has some roster flexibility as a Matt LeCroy type who can even play a decent right field.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Vogt was off their list completely until he made it to Durham.

Vogt early and Vogt often
Doesn't Bill Ballew make the Rays lists?

I don’t know if he’s actually in Durham

He made this year's list.

Don’t know about previous years.

I don't put a whole lot of stock in where Ballew ranks guys, I don't think he's very good
i do like reading his reports still, though. agreed on not putting much stock in his ranks.
He's made them as long as I can remember

Which is part of the reason I cancelled my BA subscription years ago. That said, all of these guys bounce rankings and the like off the other guys in addition to their own scouting contacts.

I can't believe Vogt made the list at 22 or at all really

and Canzler was left off. Seems odd, like they just forgot about him or something.

If you account for the side of the plate they hit from

And what thew Durham home ballpark does to left handed (suppresses pretty much everything) and right handed (1990’s Coors Field equivalent) hitters, the difference in their hitting isn’t wide enough to justify Canzler over Vogt when Vogt can play replacement level defense at catcher and three other positions and Canzler can barely do that at first. I too would have Vogt ahead of Canzler, although I’m not sure I’d have either one in my top 30. To me, Vogt seems like a poor man’s Matt LeCroy (although as far as I can tell, he’s better defensively at every position than LeCroy ever was), while Canzler seems like a poor man’s Kevin Witt.

Still laughing at Luke Bailey 15th
It's probably based on his RHP numbers & position
Position being key

Do you think they base it at all on the major league club’s need? For instance, the Rays need a catching prospect. Do they value the need of the big league club of these rankings or are they just valued relative to the minor league peers?

Splits

vs RHP- .263/.342/.469 15/57 BB/K
vs LHP- .125/.171/.181 3/32 BB/K <-(woof)

Ouch.

The good news is that he can hit rights though.

When I read your Bailey Tweet I literally had water in my mouth

and it ended up all over my computer screen from guffawing.

Bellew has always overrated catchers

Remember when he ranked Mayobanex Acosta our #12 prospect a few years back when he had a whopping .650ish OPS in Hudson Valley and wasn’t even the full-time starter? It seems like he has a random catcher or two way overrated almost every year.

THIS was the rating I was looking for upthread when I said I didn't like Ballew

Thanks, slipped my mind

Schiano the Buc !
Yeah, going to change the avatar since he decided to screw over the program
Yeah 11 seasons....YOU MUST STAY FOR LIFE
He could've left at a better time, or at least lined up a successor so we're not stuck scrambling
Ranks.

I put Romero and Mahtook over Beckham and move Vettleson down.

At what point do the Rays give up on Oconner the hitter and try him at pitching
I'd imagine he gets another 2 years at least.
He only played 1 yr of C in HS

I think I read from an interview someone had with him that he’s still adjusting to it. So I’d imagine he’s got a lot of time to work on it.

I wonder if the Rays tell these guys to focus on defense first

Work on approach at the plate. Especially catchers

Or at least the fundamentals on baseball

Seems like the players under Friedman are polished while under LaMar you made it from pure ability regardless if you were ready or not.

BJ was ready to SS at 19
Yeah that might have been on my site and he did say that.

I basically asked him…in as nice of a way as I could….why he sucked last year.

Here is link for those who might have missed it.

http://rays.scout.com/2/1148276.html

It must be tough to ask/answer that

Good interview though-you’ve really gotten a lot of solid material

Yeah it is hard sometimes.

On the one hand, I want to get the answers to the questions that I know Rays fans want to know. But on the other hand, I don’t want to piss the players off, because I want them to talk to me again this season.

I have the audio somewhere online, I’ll try and find it. You can tell that he was annoyed by the question from the tone of his voice.

and thanks!

lol

I remember the first time we discussed this interview somewhere and someone made the funniest comment about the following answer:

Justin O’Conner: I think that catching takes a little bit more focus, so it kind of takes away from my batting a little bit. I don’t think that was why I struggled. I think more the reason that I struggled was me looking at my stats all the time and worrying about that. Just getting in my own head and not relaxing, just not going out and playing.

something along the lines of “yes, justin, trying to rack those Ks up can really hurt your batting line.” it was one of the negative nancies (sf1, impy, or brick).

I said something similar here.

http://www.draysbay.com/2012/1/12/2701615/rays-winter-development-program-impressions

" Justin O’Conner was another guy I talked to that has been a bit of a disappointment in his young career. He told me that he was “paying too much attention to my stats.” I’m not sure what that means, because unless you like looking at strikeouts there wasn’t much to see from O’Conner last year."

But having said that…as with Sale, I think it is way to early to bring out the bust tag for him.

Isn’t there someone here who calls him “Bustin’ O’Conner”?

That would be sternfan1.

Bustin’ O’Conner and Josh Fale.

Jamie Yields, OHW and MOM
"Nick Green clone"
please get the players correct if it's me you're speaking of

it was Willy Taveras the player i compared Jennings to

lol... i guess memory loss happens at your age:
We have our very own One Hit Wonder Story-edit

Tiny by sternfan1 on Aug 28, 2010 8:54 AM EDT

88 comments
Story-email Email
Printer Print
CogAdmin
Story-edit Edit
Medal_silver_1 Feature
Layout FP Add
Story-delete Delete
Story-hide Hide

For those of you not familiar with the term one hit wonder it came out of the music industry in the late 50’s and early 60’s and as the phrase suggests, it described an artist who had but one smash hit and never did anything of note again.



Well Rays fans, sadly Ben Zobrist is our very own one hit wonder. I need not detail his outstanding season of 2009 where he mashed 27 HR and had an OPS well over 900, played an excellent defense and was considered a steal in the Aubrey Huff deal..



And then it happened the calender turned to 2010. His slash line is251/356/354 a sparkling 711 OPS.

He has but 28 XBH compared to 65 last year. Take out but one month and here are his OPS numbers:

April 683

June 735

July 640

August 487

In those months his HR totals are 0,1,1 and 1. Want more?

His OPS with 2 out and RISP is 672

His high leverage OPS a whopping613



And the beauty of all this, the Rays have committed $17 million dollars to this Nick Green clone over the next three seasons
reading that over he was the original MOM
As much as people pick on Sterny

It really isn’t a bad thing to have an old-guard thinker on the site, just to keep everyone else in check.

hmmm maybe that was you
Higher on Mahtook

I would put him 3rd after HJL

#15!

Maybe I can hold onto this username a little while longer after all…

Shouldn't an organization coming off a year where they got 12 of the first 89

picks be rated higher than 11?

No, no one knows if the recent draft class was any good

Especially after 09/10 fell flat

Yet some of them are top 30
Well yeah

But it’s hard to really credit the Rays yet

has Cobb graduated?
Yeah,
When did this happen?

He won’t be on the 25 man roster right?

He used his rookie eligibility.
What is that? I didn't know that existed.

Was he on the roster for 45 days?

Over 50 IP, Cobb had 52.2
Over 50 IP, over 150 PA or over 30 pitching appearances

There are also service time elements for rookie of the year eligibility, but most of the prospect publications ignore those.

BA is the lowest on them.

John hhas them 7 and I imagine most others will have them around there. This is the same BA that has Callis who said the Rays have no depth, so….

lol i didn't realize sf1 is still a mod

talk about a joke that just went way too far.

maybe i'm not understanding something, but i honestly don't understand the Sale ranking

he is 19 years old, and has played ONE SEASON of professional ball, encompassing what, 250 AB’s? how can anyone justify dropping him entirely based on what is effectively 2/5 of a season of pro ball?

Maybe it's not entirely based on that

Once again, I don’t disagree with you fundamentally. Even if he was awful, he should still probably be top 30 based on his prior reputation alone. But the scouting reports I’ve seen were god awful. He’ll keep moving up with Vettleson for now, since they’re old pals, but I’m not sure how much stock I’d put in his movement as to how the front office thinks about him.

Also, I really think the Hamilton comps are scaring people away. I haven’t heard anything indicating he’s become an alcoholic or anything, but it only took him a year to cover his entire upper body with tattoos, and some people might just be taking that as a bad sign, even if they shouldn’t be.

Let me know when he's shooting heroin
Show me the scouting reports.
Maybe I'm misrecollecting

But I remember reading things from Law, BA and someone else credible (can’t remember who) that his swing has faults in it that are so far off that there isn’t much hope. I certainly am too lazy to spend a half hour trying to find them again, so you can either take me at my word, discount me or look it up yourself. Either way – doesn’t matter much to me. No matter what, he’s too far away for me to make an independent evaluation.

I'm not sure if this is the report you are referencing

but this one even though it is few years old breaks down some of the flaws in his mechanics.

http://www.amazinavenue.com/2010/5/14/1471601/2010-draft-profile-josh-sale

No

All of the reports I’m referencing are from this year. One came from complex ball, before the season even started, the other two came after short season started. All three echoed that his swing problems are much worse than people thought coming out of high school.

Also here is a pre-draft Q & A with Sale from 2010

in which he discusses his approach to hitting and even breaks down his own swing some.

http://yankees.scout.com/2/964455.html

I have subscription to Scout, BA, and KL so I dug around.

In August, Callis said this in a chat about Sale: “Wouldn’t worry too much because it’s only his pro debut and he’s not striking out a ton. Still, that’s disappointing from a guy who was supposed to be a top high school bat.”

Then in the chat at the end of the year we heard this: “I believe it was more of a mental thing than any other aspect. He got a little pull happy and seemed completely out of rhythm. In people I’ve spoken with, some believe he had so many things going through his head that it was paralysis by analysis. Hopefully he can clear his mind this winter and arrive in spring training with a clean slate. He’s likely headed to Princeton or Hudson Valley”.

That is all I could find from BA.

From KL I found nothing. I couldn’t search the chats, s he could have mentioned something in there.

From Scout.com. I found nothing.

I can’t seem to find many scouting reports on his 2011.

Careful posting that stuff here

Wanna get the whole domain shut down?

Yeah I don't buy the Hamilton comparisons

I mean his Dad was a drug free power lifter and makes his work-out program for him and is around him all the time. Obviously I have no idea what he does in his spare time, but if there are people out there who think that just because he has a few tattoos that he is some how headed down the wrong path…well that’s just kind of stupid imo.

I don't disagree with you

But I can see where some people might debit him for it, even if it’s not justified.

what the hell? he has tattoos? this may be the dumbest argument ive ever heard for discounting a prospect.
Old-school prospecters have discounted guys for dumber reasons before

I mean, probably half of scouts are retirees who are doing this essentially for fun. So you get some guy in his mid-60’s who sees a kid get drafted, get some cash, and all of a sudden gets covered in tattoos over the course of a year. Perhaps he takes that as a proxy that not everything is right upstairs, or that he’s lacking motivation, or something else. Old school people tend to have old school biases, and they can be pretty hard to shake. You see that in all sports – where someone gets undervalued because of something that shouldn’t matter, and nobody even says anything about it out loud, but people just inherently underrate them because of some characteristic that doesn’t sit right with them.

I hate those tattoos that Beej has on every square inch of his skin, makes him look lazier
that's all well and good, but to suggest that because he got a bunch of tattoos he will likely get in to a car accident and get addicted to oxys as a result is unspeakably insane.
He's also got a pretty serious farmer's tan

Am I saying this is my view?

Thinking someone can’t quarterback because he’s black is insane too, but that’s what most people thought until the mid-80’s.

so you're just positing that some people may discount him because of his tattoos and not mention why?

it just seems like inane speculation.

It is speculation

And I think my wording indicated that. But I gave the faulty logic behind it. You know scouting types. Valid or not, there tends to be negative associations for athletes with lots of tats. It was that way in the NBA even until LeBron basically. Outside of Hamilton, who ‘turned it around’ after getting the tattoos, can you think of a MLB player with lots of tattoos who isn’t perceived by many to have personality issues?

Ryan Roberts? Jon Rauch?
AJ Burnett? Carl Crawford?
Didn't his tatoos have something to do with his heritage?
Yeah good point.

It’s important to remember that Sale is Somoan-American and tattoos are a big part of that culture.

You’re right at least some of his ink has to do with his heritage. I know the one on his arm is his Mom’s favorite Bible verse.

The old school prospectors will be happy to know then

that when I saw him at Winter Development Camp that he had a mohawk.

Yep…mohwak and tattoos…this kid is a real rabblerouser.

This from BA's Appy rankings
The 17th overall pick in 2010 and the most prized of the Rays’ Princeton prospect crop heading into the season, Sale evinced a power hitter’s strength and raw bat speed in his pro debut, but faulty swing mechanics hamstrung him for most of the season. At the urging of the Princeton coaching staff, he overhauled his swing in mid-August by eliminating the long stride that affected his swing path and altered his eye level.
Meant to bold that last sentence
Thanks for pointing that out

I hadn’t seen that

And there seemed to have been some immediate benefits from that.

Last 10 games of season from 8/21-8/30 Sale was .323/.389/.516/.905.

SSS
BABIP
and his BABIP was terrible over the corse of the season. what's your point?
My point?

It was sarcasm.

I mean obviously I'd rather see Sale put up those numbers than numbers like his rest of season ones, but we can't really draw any conclusions at all from 10 games
brick,

im not going to respond to all of your posts on sale’s swing because there are so many. ill just put this here:

“prospectors” have said there were problems with his swing. ive never seen anyone say they were irreversible as you implied. he also had an injury (to his wrist i believe) that i think is partly to blame. imo, everyone is getting all chicken little on him because his results were bad. that seems to be the story every time.

This.

And while a small group of people didn’t like the swing before the draft, most people loved it.

results in Appy league are generally irrelevant anyway

Unless they’ve changed their way, they haven’t tended to base their low-SS/complex rankings on performance in the past.

they can say it isnt based on results all they want, but these rankings ALWAYS track results very closely.
I'm not saying people aren't overreacting

But I am saying his stock legitimately dropped more than some here made it out to.

oh there's no doubt in my mind it's dropped.

then again, i thought he was overrated going in to last year as a bat-only prospect with no pro-experience/data. i still have him in the 10-20 range because i think the power will return, and he supposedly has a great work ethic/head on his shoulders (despite the tats). his k/bb numbers were fine it just seems he wasnt making GOOD contact. im willing to give him a pass because of the injury, but if he doesnt hit next year ill seriously downgrade him.

I'm with you 100%

But I’d have him at the back end of that range.

this, along with the above,

“The 17th overall pick in 2010 and the most prized of the Rays’ Princeton prospect crop heading into the season, Sale evinced a power hitter’s strength and raw bat speed in his pro debut, but faulty swing mechanics hamstrung him for most of the season. At the urging of the Princeton coaching staff, he overhauled his swing in mid-August by eliminating the long stride that affected his swing path and altered his eye level.” force me to reiterate the original question of why the hell people are completely discounting Sale after one rookie ball year? it seems ludicrous to me…

Dug up this old Friedman quote.

“He’s got an uncanny feel for the mechanics of his swing, what goes into being a successful hitter. With most high-school guys that we draft, it’s a process for us at the player-development side to educate them on that and he’s coming in extremely advanced on that front. We feel very good about the fact that he’ll be able to reach his max potential, because of who he is, the makeup, the work ethic and we are thrilled to get him where we did.”

So….assuming for a moment that there are folks out there that think his swing mechanics are uncorrectable…then the Rays REALLY goofed up, because based on this quote the ability to change stuff like that is one of the main reasons they drafted him.

I’m a believer, let’s give the kid another season before we even think about using the term “bust”.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of DRaysBay to post a comment.